I picked up a 50ct. box of 160 Nosler Accubonds, but I am hesitant to burn off the powder and projectiles on workup when all I have is 50 bullets. But I really want to find a bullet while in the one hundred sixty class that my older rifle likes.
I have utilised H4831 (and H4831SC), and I utilize it. There are not many cartridges which i utilize it for as I seem to be usually to gravitate to other powders. Nonetheless, I am unable to express that it doesn't get the job done. It is just that Several other powders operate much better for your offered cartridge. For illustration, inside the 280, H4831 gave me fantastic velocity and really fine groups with Nosler one hundred forty AB. However, RL19 was marginally greater in accuracy, however the velocity was virtually similar.
What is the primary difference? Compression. Without the extreme/weighty compression related to the prolonged grain 7828, the pressure curve was altered along with the load fell aside.
Yes it is possible to. They're the exact same exact powder even so the SC powder is just Slice shorter so it meters much better.
My encounter is that the SC and SSC loaded to the same pounds given that the very long cut reveals a decreased velocity.
Liberalism; The unattainable still accepted notion that it is fully possible to choose up a turd from the clear conclusion.
I am utilizing it that has a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as correct. RL22 did very well but I had been just a little worried about temp h4831sc load data steadiness. I think I'm at seventy two grains and get all around 2850ish fps
and you might like to put money into some new load data books. powder composition and chemistry can does modify over the years. 4831 powder of years back just isn't very same as what exactly is currently available. that is why anyone seriously interested in reloading securely may have the most latest load data publications to seek advice from.
Any load data to aid that? My first believed is it is not intending to burn all of the way and velocities is going to be sluggish and all over. Is likely to be a good fireworks Exhibit!
[e-mail guarded] gn and a hundred and fifteen CT's, I've killed far more Deer using this combo than every one of the rifles I personal blended, Work approximately this but the sweet place might be about 54, I'm a Two Little bit-06 nut and I've some things tat works really well for me When your fascinated
If there is h4831sc load data no load data it truly is because this powder is just not well suited for this cartridge. Typically just one won't uncover a person powder to fit all cartridges, as well as the relatives of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) that you're asking about won't do the job. Click to increase...
Like Everybody explained, the SC means “short Minimize” and is particularly a little bit easier to meter. Can make you dilemma why they would nevertheless make the frequent one.
Southwest Idaho I tried H4831sc in my 300 WM but experienced significantly better speed and precision with H1000. I would instead use a slower burning powder with 215g products.
I sawed a person in half to find out how thick the jackets were being, plus they have been very easily twice as thick as a fifty-grain hollow place was. Ditto for that 64-grain Energy Point, as these bullets are crafted for deer, not prairie canine or woodchucks. You now know all the things I learn about the 22-250 h4831sc load data and sluggish-burning powders, and I don't know anything in the slightest degree with regard to the 223. I question that you're going to get any where with that cartridge and 4831, but allow us to know how it goes.